The mistake is crystal clear:
Someone who likes this way of judgement should be prepared to be treated in the same way.
The mistake is crystal clear:
Hi Nick,Nick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 9:30 pmBut yeah, I'm not sure if what Wil said is true or not about calling someone out by name for something on the forum or WC no longer being against the rules. I was tracking that was one of the few hard and fast rules to never break. I've got a warning on my record from +R for violating the Call out by name rule from like 4 -5 years ago (I wasn't even calling someone out for anything just trying to find them) for just trying to see if anyone knew my neighbor at the time and offering a 10kk reward for linking me up with him because he had left the shard game years earlier and I wanted to buy his house (this was before IDOCs would actually fall).
Hi,
As well as this 2013 post: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6609+Colibri wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:50 pm[*] @qbf: you mentioned in your first reply, "don't buy from Michelancello". This is blacklisting, and not allowed. As you pointed out, it would be good to be able to call out the potentially suspicious sellers, and if you stick to facts and not go against the person/name, that is (and should be) allowed. Maybe this should be an overall rule, for discussing anything in chat, or on the forum. For example, this is allowed: "i had this same item on my vendor for weeks and it didn't sell, finally got it to sell for 800k, so I'd say it's not worth 10mil". But this isn't: "Don't buy from ProverbialSaruman, he always scams people".
I think that was Nick's original point - if you don't like the behaviour call the thread"annoying TC macros" or something. The thread is literally called "About John Warren..." I don't like it. I if there's an issue with the activity/behaviour then make a post about that. I don't need to have my name dragged through the mud as some obnoxious player trying to wreck peoples fun. I have paged in game about the thread title.
Okay. Well, I don't see how the particular words +C used on the forums twice in ten years (let alone the ones he used on the web page documenting the official rules) give rise to a belief that Ranametalera violated those rules. I definitely don't see how it abstracts to some broad rule to the effect that, "You talk about the problem, not the player. Naming the player is not allowed." +C seems to say pretty clearly that naming the player IS allowed as long as you aren't "blacklisting" as he calls it.